Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! http://a-albionic.com/topic/54/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA- en-us Copyright 2011, Yuku ceco@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:59:32 GMT Mon, 20 Dec 2010 01:13:55 GMT Kickapps Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/549/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-549 Ole Dude wrote:
I will post the article titled "Neoconservatism: a CIA Front?"

Yes, I am very aware of that line of thought and used to accept much of it. I responded to the article directly.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/549 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:40:43 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/545/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-545 LloydMiller wrote:
Ole Dude wrote:
And what is your association with the NeoCons, please?

I have observed the activities of the National Review, Buckley crowd since the early 1960s. William Buckley was a primary supporter of the NeoCons.
I have never thought of Buckley as a NeoCon per se. In my research on Buckley and the National Review I found a revealing article referenced by wikipedia that seems to explain the relationship rather well. Not only that it seems to explain the operation you have been involved in as well as the participation of the COINTELPRO type anti-paleoconservative operative known as Ernie. I will post the article titled " feeds@yuku.com (Ole Dude) http://a-albionic.com/reply/545 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:03:56 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/531/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-531 Ole Dude wrote:
And what is your association with the NeoCons, please?

I have observed the activities of the National Review, Buckley crowd since the early 1960s. William Buckley was a primary supporter of the NeoCons. People have joked that Buckley was never sure anyone was anti-Communist unless they were a convert from Communism.

No one wants to claim him at this point. But his status as a NeoCon puppet is what characterized his term. Regardless of what he may have attempted to remove the stink, it was NeoCon stink.

Stink? Smashing OPEC? Restoring a modicum of free-enterprise to the oil industry? Bush deserted the outstanding plans of the NeoCons as soon as he realized Big Oil and the Saudis opposed said plans.

This is another of... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/531 Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:47:11 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/530/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-530 Ole Dude wrote:
LloydMiller wrote:
The Question is "which State Capitalists" and their divergent policies: the degree of socialism and Islamic tyranny to be imposed as required to destroy the US as we know it.
This is classic Hegelian dialectic mass mind control. Present two seemingly opposing views as though they were the only choices available. Then force the "electorate" to "approve" one or the other so they can be held responsible. "You can place it in the orifice of your choosing" is more descriptive of the selection process. Nonsense!

]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/530 Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:33:28 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/529/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-529 LloydMiller wrote:
Apparently, you have no first hand knowledge of the NeoCons. And what is your association with the NeoCons, please?

Bush is no NeoCon himself.

No one wants to claim him at this point. But his status as a NeoCon puppet is what characterized his term. Regardless of what he may have attempted to remove the stink, it was NeoCon stink.

the Judeo-Masonic / Anglophile power organism.

This is another of your smear expressions. At some points it conjurs up images of Anglophile Imperialists, at another point it refers to the Anglophile socialists, at still other times it seems to emphasize a NeoCon wannabe Anglophile organism, but never, in your... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Ole Dude) http://a-albionic.com/reply/529 Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:19:53 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/524/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-524 Ole Dude wrote:
If Bush is any indicator of the depth of their comprehension this is true, but it is obvious that Bush, even more so than most presidents since JFK, was a puppet. Why do you think conspiracy theorizing has become so popular? Apparently, you have no first hand knowledge of the NeoCons. Irving Kristol was the founder. Apparently he or other NeoCons have drawn inspiration from Straus. Bush is no NeoCon himself. When he was pressured by the Rockefeller / OPEC / Saudi camarilla he vetoed the NeoCon plans to smash OPEC via Iraq and fired the NeoCons. This was a long long time ago.

Conspiracy theorizing has now become popular because it NOW serves the Rockefeller / Saudi-OPEC camarilla and is guided by the anti-Bush critiquies of the New York Times. Through the persistence of his "underground" campaign, LaRouche has been... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/524 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:37:52 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/522/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-522 It is weird that what Irving Kristol thought BEFORE HE BECAME A CONSERVATIVE is considered "key" in "conspairacy land."

This is not weird at all when one considers the liklihood that neocoservativism was not so much an ideological movement as an effort to coopt (and hence control) conservatives into a power structure ultimately to include both neo-cons and neo-libs via Hegelian maneuvre. In this view ideology is used as a tool, not an aspiration. This view is further supported by the teachings of Leo Strauss, considered a father of the neocons, supporting the use of "noble lies" (ala Plato) and myths used by political leaders seeking to maintain a cohesive society. As we all now know this philosophy blew up in the face of Bush.

Why do you insist on engaging in demonization as the fundamental basis for your absurd allegations rather than dealing... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Ole Dude) http://a-albionic.com/reply/522 Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:43:11 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/516/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-516 Ole Dude wrote:
Is this the Anglo faction you are supporting against Rockefeller? It does not appear to be the same as the neo-con faction that you have also stated support. The neo-cons seem to be derived from ex-Trotskyists. Are you purposefully attempting to obfuscate as a prerequisite for perception management or to stimulate book sales? Yes, the founding NeoCon had a Trotskyist past. [It is weird that what Irving Kristol thought BEFORE HE BECAME A CONSERVATIVE is considered "key" in "conspairacy land." Apparently, this is a nonsensical propaganda tactic to "smear" NeoConservatism.] However, Kristol came to support Capitalism which, though I don't think NeoCons understand well, is, in effect, the traditional Judeo-Masonic / Anglophile would be Master Conspiracy of which you speak above. Unless it is a deep secret... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/516 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:06:06 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/508/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-508 Ole Dude wrote:

I find it difficult to ignore the liklihood that in setting up the OSS that the sophisticated British Intelligence service was incapable of establishing defacto control, especially considering the heavy anglophile representation in the FDR administration. According to Dr. Emanuel Josephson and others, there was little "Anglophile" representation in FDR's Administration. Its primary target from the "get go" was the Morgan Group which it deemed "Economic Royalists" (meant more literally than most presumed) at the behest of the Rockefellers. The abortive coup attempt exposed by Marine General Smedly Butler was led by Morgan/Anglophile forces.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/508 Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:39:40 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/507/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-507 Ole Dude wrote:
Are you suggesting that Menzies and perhaps even Harold Wilson were a part of the Philby spy ring? I have not found any support for this via my internet searches.
the Project: Spring 1989, Volume VI, Number 2

"C" the Secret Life of Sir Stewart Menzies: Spymaster to Winston Churchill by Anthony Cave Brown. Contrary to popular opion, that Parliament and the Prime Minister hold the real power in Britain, the author of "C" repeatedly stresses the very real power of the Sovereign over the SIS, claiming even that the tradition of all SIS members being anonymous by Act of Parliament dates back to Henry VII which the Project identified as the first reign of the "Conspiracy." Henry VII, according to Brown, made the post of spymaster of England the "Royal Gift" which it remains to this day! Brown... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/507 Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:56:47 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/487/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-487 Ole Dude wrote:
I find inconsistent your division of Rockefeller into the socialist camp when the record would indicate heavy alliance with Fascism. Rockefeller support for the British originated synthesis of State capitalism/communitarianism seems more likely.
The Rockefellers support what favors their geopolitics at a particular moment in history. The have supported the Nazis, Fascists, Socialists, Soviets, etc. and certainly moderate movements too . . but certainly none of that defines them. Currently, they support socialism in America via Obama as a demagogic technique and, quite possibly, to bring America down to the point where it can be merged into a Islamic, UN, New World Order.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/487 Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:02:11 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/476/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-476 Ole Dude wrote:
The CIA was not created until 1947, long after FDR's death. The OSS preceded the CIA. The CIA site seems to contradict your assertion. It appears the OSS/CIA was greatly influenced by its British counterpart rather than being a Rockefeller preserve.
I consider the OSS/CIA to be approximately one and the same.

Sure the OSS/CIA learned from their MI6 tutors, much to the dismay of the MI6! As they failed to bring the (Rockefeller) CIA to Anglo heel, the Brit's MI6 under Menzies decided to tilt toward the Soviets via Harold Wilson thus the transfer of Atomic and Jet technology to the Soviets. I wrote about this in detail in the Project. Fascinating work if I must say so myself! This also clarifies the whole "Philby" episode and... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/476 Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:36:18 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/466/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-466 LloydMiller wrote:
the CIA and State Department which have been Rockefeller preserves since Nelson "co-ordinated" the Hemisphere for FDR.
The CIA was not created until 1947, long after FDR's death. The OSS preceded the CIA. The CIA site seems to contradict your assertion. It appears the OSS/CIA was greatly influenced by its British counterpart rather than being a Rockefeller preserve.
Excerpts from:
OSS eventually developed a capable counterintelligence apparatus of its own overseas-the X-2 Branch-but it had no... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Ole Dude) http://a-albionic.com/reply/466 Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:20:59 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/461/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-461 Ole Dude wrote:
Thank you. I accordance with your request and in support of your contention please see:
Ak Qaeda and the "War on Terrorism" The article you mention is a far-out conspiracy theory and contains obviously misleading interpretations as I noted in a post following it. Clearly, it is irrational anti-war, if not Socialist or Islamic propaganda.

In suggesting a google I was talking about the myriad of reports that the Saudis sponsored, in co-operation with the CIA, Jihadists to fight in Afghanistan against the Russians and even had a plan (apparently also supported by the Rockefeller's CIA) for a Central Asian Islamic Republic.

A mistake made by "conspiracy land" is assuming that the USA is "unitary". The alliance of the CIA with Islam to bring down the Soviets was a Rockefeller project... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/461 Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:57:40 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/458/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-458 LloydMiller wrote:
Their have been report after report of the Saudi funding of anti-Soviet fighters in Afghanistan. Are you serious. . . . ? Google it yourself.

Thank you. I accordance with your request and in support of your contention please see:
Ak Qaeda and the "War on Terrorism" ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Ole Dude) http://a-albionic.com/reply/458 Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:25:13 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/454/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-454 Ole Dude wrote:
Could you please elaborate on the specific example? You only repeat your mantra in this statement. What specifically have they done to use Islam as a weapon? Would you suggest, for example that the Rockefellers and the Saudi government funded and/or provided training for the Wahhabi to fight the Soviet Union and later the West? If so what evidence do you have to support your claim? Certainly. Zbig helped David Rockefeller found the Trilateral Commission which elected Carter. Carter followed Zbig's policy in Afghanistan. . . do you pay no attention at all to the news? The CIA always has been a Rockefellers playground. Have you forgotten the CIA undermining of Bush and the NeoCons?

There has been report after report of the Saudi funding of anti-Soviet fighters in Afghanistan. Are you serious. . . . ? Google it... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/454 Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:53:15 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/443/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-443 Ole Dude wrote:
I would feel more comfortable focusing on the source of a problem rather than aiming a shotgun at a major segment of the population of the earth. . . . .Can you provide any other examples of a dangerous elite using Islam as a weapon?

Sure, the Saud and Rockefeller Dynasties.

However, Islam, as a BORG can generate a new elite should its current elite fail. . . that is what Al Qeda claims to propose.

BORGs or social organisms have an existence and maybe even consciousness beyond the individual minds that make them up. Just as the human ego is an emergent reality beyond the individual cells and organs of the human body/brain, so is the Islamic BORG an emergent reality beyond the cells of its masses / elites.

Your "reductive" analysis of the Islamic Collective misses the mark. A... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/443 Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:33:54 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/435/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-435 LloydMiller wrote:
Islam has always presented a threat for world tyranny.

Religions are used by a ruling elite for purposes of social control. In some cases they may be used as a weapon by one set of elites in an effort to neutralize or extinguish the the base of humanity controlled by another competing. It might be helpful if you identified the ruling elite that you perceive to be controlling Islam so that the problem, if it exists, can be addressed at its source rather than directing your attack against a helpless segment of humanity unable to overcome the mind control efforts of their superiors. I have identified one source of modern day programming as the stream of religious fanatic training provided by MI-6 and the CIA presumably to combat USSR occupation of Afganistan, but which has been... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Ole Dude) http://a-albionic.com/reply/435 Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:03:25 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/430/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-430 Ole Dude wrote:
But the obvious ruse of presenting Islam as a threat of world tyranny IS coincident with mass media propaganda. Your questionable segmentation of a state capitalist faction allied with Islam vs. one opposed to Islam as a major theme. My apologies if you are unaware of the extent your views are supporting the media us vs. Islam nonsense.

No, the mass media ran George Bush and his NeoCons out of office because of his anti-Islamic War on Terror. Are you completely out of touch? Conspiracy Land and the New York Times (leader of the mass media) is at one in their 5th Column activities.

Obvious ruse? Islam has always presented a threat for world tyranny.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (LloydMiller) http://a-albionic.com/reply/430 Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:56:13 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/reply/419/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA-#reply-419 LloydMiller wrote:
To the best of my knowledge conflict between major State Capitalist factions is not a common theme of the mass media, so you must be accusing me of deviously contriving a dichotomy.
But the obvious ruse of presenting Islam as a threat of world tyranny IS coincident with mass media propaganda. Your questionable segmentation of a state capitalist faction allied with Islam vs. one opposed to Islam as a major theme. My apologies if you are unaware of the extent your views are supporting the media us vs. Islam nonsense.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (Ole Dude) http://a-albionic.com/reply/419 Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:30:54 PST <![CDATA[ Anti-British Hidden Hand Behind OBAMA! ]]> http://a-albionic.com/topic/54/Anti-British-Hidden-Hand-Behind-OBAMA- Yes, the Rockefeller / Vatican / Islamic TRADITIONALLY ANTI-BRITISH hidden hand behind OBAMA is showing! A-albionic theories confirmed! -- Lloyd Miller

Wednesday, March 04, 2009
http://redstaterusa.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-reparing-americas-image-in-world.html

Obama: Reparing America's Image in the World by Disrespecting Allies