Conspiracy Book Inventory Liquidation Sale / Auction
FREE! Rare, Out-of-Print, Hard-to-Find Book Searches
Subscribers
Site--Access Back Issue of the A-albionic Quarterly Journal, the Project, and Much, Much More. . .
Freemasonry's Hidden Homosexual Agenda http://www.nicenetruth.com/home/2009/08/freemasonrys-hidden-homosexual-agenda.html#comment-form
[Obviously, we Catholics do not place women "lower" given that St. Mary, the Theotokos, is the Queen of heaven. This article is hinting at what Craig Heimbichner details in his Blood on the Altar concerning the elite masonic occult homosexual acts. -Jay]
Via
HenryMakow.com
By "Heterosexuals for a Moral
Environment"
(I didn't write this article but it inspired a "eureka" moment. Of course! This explains why so many politicians are gay, and why
homosexuality is being foisted on us. I edited a little. -HM)
The esoteric all-male group known as Freemasonry (or Masonry) has been controversial for many years, and has been connected to
homosexuality by a number of researchers. "Why?" you may ask.
Albert Pike was Sovereign Grand Commander of the (Masonic) Scottish Rite's Southern Jurisdiction from 1859-1891. He published a book called
Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in 1871, of which there were several subsequent editions. Citations
from Pike's magnum opus will be featured here.
Like other esoteric groups and some fraternities, the Masons have secret doctrines and initiations. Now, as Pike mysteriously put it, Freemasonry
"conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols
to mislead those who deserve only to be misled; to conceal the Truth, which it calls Light, from them, and to draw them away from it. Truth is not for
those who are unworthy or unable to receive it, or would pervert it."1
Instead of Masons explicitly spelling out their secrets, they only obliquely impart them. Pike states: "What the Chiefs of the Order really believed and taught, is indicated to the Adepts by the hints contained in the high degrees of Free-masonry."2 Pike again: "The symbols and ceremonies of Masonry have more than one meaning. They rather conceal than disclose the Truth. They hint it only."3 More: "We have hints, and not details,"4 "hints of the true objects and purposes of the Mysteries."5 (The "Mysteries" are secret Masonic "Truths" and secret initiatory rituals.)
Pike is wont to speaking in enigmas because he can only hint at Masonic secrets. Masons take oaths not to reveal the group's secrets.
Upper-level Masons even keep secrets from lower-level Masons. According to Pike, a lower-level Mason "is intentionally misled by false interpretations [of Masonic symbols]. It is not intended that he shall understand them [the symbols]; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry."6 Lower-level Masons are just dupes being used by the upper-level ones, the so-called "Princes of Masonry."
Now, to direct our attention to the connection between Masonry and homosexuality: Are Masons using their power and influence to try to spread homosexual "values"? In the following enigmatic words, Pike seems to be saying that Mason [adepts] engage in homosexual oral sex.
He states that an initiate "commemorates in sacramental observance this mysterious passion; and while partaking of the raw flesh of the victim, seems to be invigorated by a fresh draught from the fountain of universal life....Hence the significance of the phallus."7 As is his wont, Pike does not explain these words. For example, he does not spell out what he means by "this mysterious passion." But elsewhere in the book he twice notes that phallic worship is a part of their "Ancient Mysteries."8
Not only does homosexual sex apparently play a role in Masonry, but homosexual orgies evidently do too.
Pike, speaking in general of a newly initiated member, says: "he mingles with the crowd of Initiates, and, crowned with flowers, celebrates with them the holy orgies."9 Needless to say, Pike does not define "holy orgy." In at least two other locations in his book he mentions that orgies are associated with Masonic initiations.10 [Pike has a reputation for indulging in debaucheries as well as Satanic butchery. HM]
A noteworthy characteristic shared by Masonry and homosexuaity which points to a possible connection between the two, is the prevalence of sexist attitudes amongst the members of both groups.
(It is understandable that homosexuals can develop negative feelings for the opposite sex because every time a, say, male homosexual sees a woman he is reminded of his abnormality, of his impotency with women, of his heterophobia. Moreover, if, say, a male homosexual lets himself have warm feelings for a woman he may begin to wonder about his sexual identity. [One homosexual author, Dennis Altman, admits: "Undoubtedly for many homosexuals there is something threatening in the idea of intimacy with the other sex."11] Also, homosexuals clearly have little use for the opposite sex, generally speaking.
Various lesbian and male homosexual authors have drawn attention to that sexism: e.g., lesbian authors Virginia E. Vida,12 Molly McGarry,13, and Lillian Faderman,14 plus male homosexual authors Simon LeVay,15 Martin Duberman,16 Dennis Altman,17 and Eric Marcus.18
In 1997, two lesbian groups got so fed up with the sexist behavior of male homosexuals that they boycotted the North Side Gay and Lesbian Pride Parade in Chicago "because they say gay men among the spectators harassed them verbally and physically in the past,"19 as reported by a Chicago Sun-Times journalist, Ernest Tucker, in his article "Girlcott hits sexism at gay parade."
Now to return to Masonry---which, we should keep in mind---is an all-male group, Pike provides serious evidence of organizational sexism in Masonry via these words: "The love of woman cannot die out; and it has a terrible and uncontrollable fate."20 As usual, he does not explain what he means by this startling statement (but the heterophobic meaning seems obvious enough).
Elsewhere he stated that "Christianity...gave to woman her proper rank and influence; it regulated domestic life."21
In some circles it is a common opinion, misguided or not, that Christianity, especially Catholicism, places women at a lower rank than men because women cannot become priests or bishops or cardinals or popes and because wives are supposed to be submissive or subordinate to their husbands, generally speaking.
In sum, while Pike does not explicitly declare that women are inferior to men, or that they are unworthy of love, he does seem to strongly hint at that, just like he strongly hints at other things.
Freemasonry is still a force in America and the world. The fact that this group is evidently biased against women (who cannot join the group) and biased in favor of homosexual relationships should not go unmentioned, and neither should the very real possibility that this group is using its influence to try to impose pro-homosexual "values" on the public.
We'll end this short essay with a quote from Masonic author Carl H. Claudy: "The real secrets of Masonry are never told, not even mouth to ear. For the real secret of Masonry is spoken to your heart, and from it to that of your brother [Mason]. Never the language made for tongue may speak it; it is uttered only in the language of the eye, in those manifestations of that love which a man has for his friend, which passeth all other loves, even that of woman."22 Note those last four words.
-----------
Originally" "Freemasonry's Connection to the Homosexual Movement"
http://www.home60515.com/23.html (source and Footnotes)
Related- Freemason Influence on Hip Hop (Youtube)
and Freemasonry Unmasked (Youtube)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f0bd87388340120a5637f74970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Freemasonry's Hidden Homosexual Agenda:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
To put it another way, it seems Jung thought the Catholic Church enjoins the faithful to "deny" instincts/archetypes and "project" them on Satan.
Thus, the Catholic would see himself struggling against an outside force, Satan, instead of struggling against impulses arising from within.
This goes to far. Its one thing to disagree with a philosophy not your own, but then to disparage it in this manner? To far.
No where in the degrees of masonry is any sexual act suggested, and to take Pikes quotes out of context to their meaning, with out citing page and purpose is just plain dishonest.
Posted by: http://www.freemasoninformation.com href="http://www.freemasoninformation.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>Greg | August 22, 2009 at 09:29 AM
The links are at the original and I have seen stories come out about gay perversion amongst masons. And the priests that raped kids are even worse scumbags - I admit. But if you know about elite masonry, this is correct. Read about Crowley's rituals - they're totally gay.
Posted by: Jay Dyer | August 22, 2009 at 10:23 AM
i am schedualed to join the fraternity.at 22 years old i enter with my own ieas on civility and every faith that they will not be tyrinnically re moulded.we as individuals make our own preferences.references to luciferian connections are also poppycott!!! bad men infultrate every organisation and it is the task of the good to offset the bad.life is reminiscent of a chessboard! black fights white! and white fights black! alway has,always will!
Posted by: the stoman | August 22, 2009 at 11:11 AM
The history and symbols of the Knights Templar also suggest homosexuality. A large part of Masonry is based on Templarism. . . some claim Masonry's goal was to re-create Templarism.
Ok, what is the context that makes the following NOT a reference to ritual homosexual experience:
********He states that an initiate "commemorates in sacramental observance this mysterious passion; and while partaking of the raw flesh of the victim, seems to be invigorated by a fresh draught from the fountain of universal life....Hence the significance of the phallus."7 ********
The other possible interpretation is CANNIBALISM!
Posted by: http://a-albionic.com href="http://a-albionic.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>Lloyd Miller | August 22, 2009 at 02:31 PM
Here's the entire paragraph in context (with the posted excerpt bolded):
"Man descended from the elemental Forces or Titans [Elohim], who fed on the body of the Pantheistic Deity creating the Universe by self-sacrifice, commemorates in sacramental observance this mysterious passion; and while partaking of the raw flesh of the victim, seems to be invigorated by a fresh draught from the fountain of universal life, to receive a new pledge of regenerated existence. Death is the inseparable antecedent of life; the seed dies in order to produce the plant, and earth itself is rent asunder and dies at the birth of Dionusos. Hence the significancy of the phallus, or of its inoffensive substitute, the obelisk, rising as an emblem of resurrection by the tomb of buried Deity at Lerna or at Sais."
http://sacred-texts.com/mas/md/md25.htm
I can't understand Pike - nor do I care to - but the excerpt seems to have been deliberate in order to give the impression of homosexuality. The "partaking of the raw flesh" bit, is actually the Titans, and the phallus bit makes sense in context as well. But ... whatever - the guy's still nuts anyway! And so are the Masons for using the book.
Pike cribbed heavily from Eliphas Levi, as did Crowley. So maybe Levi was as gay as Crowley - ditto for Pike. Levi was a Templar nut too, and is responsible for the famous androgynous Baphomet drawing!
Posted by: http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/ href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>Terry | August 23, 2009 at 05:55 AM
Well, no! The "partaking of raw flesh" is what man does to commemorate (in occult ritual) what the Titans did in the creation of the world (according to Pike).
Of course, the Catholic Mass (partaking of the flesh of Christ to commemorate Christ's sacrifice for mankind)is also suggestive of either cannibalism or oral sex in similar ways. The holy water dispenser is notoriously phallic as well. Maybe Catholic rituals are a bit too "suggestive" to Priests and lead too many to experiment with the choir boys.
Crowley from his AutoBio does not seem particularly gay in the sense of "loving the same sex", but single-minded in pursuing the occult secrets which he ultimately claimed to find in ritual homosexual and other sex acts.
I don't have the references handy, but, certainly, Crowley claimed to have found an occult secret of a immense value in ritual, homosexual, oral sex (spiritual regeneration, lucidity, yadda, yadda). Crowley said with only a little equivocation to avoid pornocgraphy laws what Pike seems to be only hinting at obliquely. Apparently, Crowley thought he had discovered an entire occult science he labelled "Sex Magic."
The full context of the Pike quote validates my memory of how he wrote. The "hint" is glaringly apparent ONLY with the clipping of words shown in the original quote under discussion.
Posted by: http://a-albionic.com href="http://a-albionic.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>Lloyd Miller | August 23, 2009 at 10:45 AM
There's virtually nothing sexual about the mass/divine liturgy in our symbolism. But even still, heterosexual sex in marriage does have powerful symbolism and is, for us, a sacrament. God made the phallus - we aren't prudes, but we think it has a purpose and that purpose is between a man and a woman in marital union. Read Genesis 18-19. And no, the eating of the Eucharist is in no way, ever, in our symbolism, read as something sexual, except that the union of man and woman is compared to Christ and the Church, but that is imagery - we don't draw from that the blasphemous idea that we are sexually united to Jesus - it's the other way around, the union of man and woman is an image of the divine. That's why Crowley took it and sexualized it the other way. And no, the holy water dispenser is not phallic. Is anything that is extended phallic? That's silly. In order to do semiotics and symbology rightly, we look to that system's meanings and intended purposes, not inventing whatever we want. In Masonry, there is inner-masonic evidence that points in that way. You will never find in our theology something that makes the holy water dispenser phallic, nor will you find phallic worship, other than what is imported from some other semiotic system and pasted on.
Posted by: Jay Dyer | August 23, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Oh snap... I just noticed that my kitchen faucet is phallic.
Give me a break...
Posted by: Robert Nash | August 23, 2009 at 05:33 PM
Just to be upfront, in spite of being born Catholic, I have big problems with the Catholic Church on many levels especially when it has been a close partner of the State.
However, unlike most critics, I try to maintain a reasonable perspective. Compared to say, Islam, the Satanic Occult, or the LEFT, the Catholic Church is a fountain of reason and hope for humanity.
Most recently, in the face of the prospect of Euthanasia and "Nationalization of the Human Body" raised by ObamaCare, I am thankful for the remaining influence of the Church in promoting its conception of the sanctity of of "LIFE" eventhough I think the Church goes too far in endorsing State policing of private decisions on abortion and, at least in the past, contraception.
It is especially clear right now, with Obama trotting out his DEATH SCIENTISTS, that disagreements over the borderline issues should not blind us to basic agreements.
That said, the central rituals of the Church involving the Altar, the Eucharist, etc. seem atavistic, drawing on pagan symbols and brutalities which so fascinate the Satanic Occultists like Crowley, LaVey, etc. Altars, historically, it seems to me, were for bloody sacrifice of animals and even humans. Admittedly, the Catholic Church probably was doing its best to end brutal Pagan practices by keeping the concept of "sacrifice" but injecting a new uplifting, humanity transforming meaning via the story of Christ.
On the other hand, the Inquisition makes one wonder about the motives of the Church.
Posted by: http://a-albionic.com href="http://a-albionic.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>Lloyd Miller | August 24, 2009 at 08:47 AM
Is anything "extended" phallic?
This depends on your theory of the human mind. If you believe the "tabula rasa" theory (blank slate) theory, then no. To see the phallus in anything extended, a person would have to be actively seeking such titillation or prompting for sexual license. Does not the Catholic Church via Aristotle/Aquinas endorse the tabula rasa theory and consider evil thoughts sinful?
However, if Jung and other "instinct" theorists are correct and the rational mind is built (evolved) upon a primitive animal brain (so it would appear by study of anatomy), then anything "extended" may provoke automatically, beyond individual will, thoughts of the phallus and its use. (Of course, the exercise of a reasonable moral code could keep this in bounds even so.)
Note that Albert Pike refers to this by bringing up the obelisk as an "inoffensive" phallic symbol: "Hence the significancy of the phallus, or of its inoffensive substitute, the obelisk, rising as an emblem of resurrection by the tomb of buried Deity at Lerna or at Sais."
It has been claimed it was the Masons who designed the Washington Monument as an obelisk to commemorate the "father of our country."
Posted by: http://a-albionic.com href="http://a-albionic.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>Lloyd Miller | August 24, 2009 at 09:03 AM
I think I recall Michael Hoffman drawing attention to the obelisk "erected" in the Vatican as evidence of Satanic influence within the Church.
Posted by: http://a-albionic.com href="http://a-albionic.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>Lloyd Miller | August 24, 2009 at 09:26 AM
Ruminating on:
Are all "instinct" theorists (Freud, Jung, etc etc) to be rejected as "Satanic" from a Catholic perspective? Certainly, both Freud and Jung appeared to lose their moral bearings to an extent due to their "delving" into the instincts via meditative (occult?) practices.
Freud's psychology has been identified by some as Satanic fantasy. Freud went pretty far apparently in his personal experimentation with cocaine and sex. Jung went so far as to bring a second woman into his home, practicing polygamy. Certainly, he went far beyond rational/scientific inspection of the subconscious instinct/archetypes, creating an occult religion based on such introspection, claiming visions, voices. . .God knows what.
Jung thought the Catholic Church's condemnatory approach to reality of the subconscious/unconscious instincts/archetypes of the human mind was wrong headed and amounts to denial of reality in pursuit of the unattainable ideal of a "pure and perfect" Christ-like consciousness. Of course, he though Satan is simply a Catholic symbol for the subconscious/unconscious. He thought Catholic consciousness unstable because of this "denial". He thought it a mistake to think humanity can be improved by urging it to deny the reality of unconscious instincts. He often said one must "give the devil his due," . . . a slippery slope as evidence by his own life.
Posted by: http://a-albionic.com href="http://a-albionic.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>Lloyd Miller | August 24, 2009 at 09:45 AM