0 Points

Israel hires bloggers to patrol anti-war blog sites. cunni123@yahoo.com

Author

Comment

LloydMiller

Israel hires bloggers to patrol anti-war blog sites. cunni123@yahoo.com

Lead

[-]

Posts: 603

Jan 22 09 4:57 AM

Tags : None

Attempted post to old [prj] site by cunni123@yahoo.com

Just so you recognize it when you see it!!!!

We don't want anything to interfere with them murdering infants and children.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=7236

Israel Recruits Army Of Bloggers To Troll Anti-War Websites

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, January 19, 2009

Israel Recruits Army Of Bloggers To Troll Anti-War Websites 190109top2

Israel has announced that it is setting up a network of bloggers to combat websites deemed "problematic" by the Zionist state, presumably to propagandize about the necessity of killing babies and infants in the name of self-defense.

Israel's global reputation for being the new Nazis was already firmly established, but the ceaseless and indiscriminate bombing of Gaza, labeled a war crime by international observers, has hardened opinion against the country and this has manifested itself nowhere more than the world wide web.

Israel's response will be to flood the Internet with PR agents who will attempt to create a phony consensus that the ZIonist state's barbarian actions are justifiable.

According to a report in Haaretz, the Immigrant Absorption Ministry is setting up "an army of bloggers" who will "represent" Israel on "anti-Zionist blogs" in English, French, Spanish and German.

The ministry's director-general Erez Halfon told Haaretz that over a million people who speak a second language are being targeted in a recruiting drive that will then direct the volunteers to web sites deemed "problematic." Presumably their mission would be to troll comment boards and forums with pro-Zionist arguments, a public relations stunt that we have seen employed by other entities such as Monsanto and more recently Centcom and the U.S. Air Force.

Such ongoing efforts to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror are well documented.

CENTCOM has programs underway to infiltrate blogs and message boards to ensure people, "have the opportunity to read positive stories,"presumably about how Iraq is a wonderful liberated democracy and the war on terror really is about protecting Americans from Al-CIAda.

In May 2008, it was revealed that the Pentagon was expanding "Information Operations" on the Internet with purposefully set up foreign news websites, designed to look like independent media sources but in reality carrying direct military propaganda.

More recently the New York Times published an expose on privately hired operatives who have been appearing on all major US news networks promoting the interests and operations of the Pentagon and generating favorable news coverage of the Bush administration while posing as independent military analysts.

This operation was formally announced In 2006 when the Pentagon set up a unit to "better promote its message across 24-hour rolling news outlets, and particularly on the internet".
Again, the Pentagon said the move would boost its ability to counter "inaccurate" news stories and exploit new media.

Just over a week ago, the US Air Force announced a "counter-blog" response plan aimed at fielding and reacting to material from bloggers who have "negative opinions about the US government and the Air Force."

The plan, created by the public affairs arm of the Air Force, includes a detailed twelve-point "counter blogging" flow-chart that dictates how officers should tackle what are described as "trolls," "ragers," and "misguided" online writers.

Research related articles:

Lloyd Miller, Research Director
A-albionic Research
A-albionic Research Inventory Liquidation Sale

Reply Quote

Advertisement
	Remove this ad Remove this ad

Ole Dude

Israel recruits 'army of bloggers' to combat anti-Zionist Web sites

#1

[-]

Posts: 205

Jan 22 09 10:27 AM

The following article is a little closer to the source. Perhaps you guys will recognize this as an example of the weltanschauung control which I have pointed out is the front line of the NWO offensive.

I would suggest the liklihood that the nonsense I was met with when I began participating on this list was associated with "volunteers" recruited to neutralize lists deemed "problematic." It seems likely that the current lack of participation in the group has resulted from the success of the program. That Ernie is acquainted with an FBI COINTELPRO expert (mentioned in a [prj] list post on 12/11/08) did not miss my oversight. Bill and Milton made their unsupportive reason for participation rather clear.

Ole Dude

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1056648.html

Last update - 07:14 19/01/2009

Israel recruits 'army of bloggers' to combat anti-Zionist Web sites

By Cnaan Liphshiz

Tags: Israel, anti-Semitism, blog

The Immigrant Absorption Ministry announced on Sunday it was setting up an "army of bloggers," to be made up of Israelis who speak a second language, to represent Israel in "anti-Zionist blogs" in English, French, Spanish and German.

The program's first volunteer was Sandrine Pitousi, 31, from Kfar Maimon, situated five kilometers from Gaza. "I heard about the project over the radio and decided to join because I'm living in the middle of the conflict," she said.

Before hanging up the phone prematurely following a Color Red rocket alert, Pitousi, who immigrated to Israel from France in 1993, said she had some experience with public relations from managing a production company.

"During the war, we looked for a way to contribute to the effort," the ministry's director general, Erez Halfon, told Haaretz. "We turned to this enormous reservoir of more than a million people with a second mother tongue." Other languages in which bloggers are sought include Russian and Portuguese.

Halfon said volunteers who send the Absorption Ministry their contact details by e-mail, at media@moia.gov.il, will be registered according to language, and then passed on to the Foreign Ministry's media department, whose personnel will direct the volunteers to Web sites deemed "problematic."

Within 30 minutes of announcing the program, which was approved by the Foreign Ministry on Sunday, five volunteers were already in touch, Halfon said.

Related articles:

Reply Quote

LloydMiller

#2

[-]

Posts: 603

Jan 22 09 8:40 PM

I think Bill and Milton were possible Mossad "volunteer" plants. Ernie, on the other hand, I think is an independent "anti-conspiracy" student and researcher.

Bill and Milton had little interest in or understanding of conspiracy topics and even seemed to admit at times they were here just to harass conspiracy theorists.

In spite of the fact I OPPOSE the popular "anti-Zionist" "anti-Semitic" orientation of most "conspiracy theories" they were intent on tagging me as an anti-Semite.

Wasn't it Milton that said he had also infiltrated a neo-Nazi site? Actually, I don't necessarily oppose people participating in sites where they oppose the overall message as long as they don't resort to electronic sabotage or suppression of free speech, etc.

Lloyd Miller, Research Director
A-albionic Research
A-albionic Research Inventory Liquidation Sale

Reply Quote

LloydMiller

#3

[-]

Posts: 603

Jan 22 09 8:57 PM

Ole Dude wrote:
I would suggest the liklihood that the nonsense I was met with when I began participating on this list was associated with "volunteers" recruited to neutralize lists deemed "problematic." It seems likely that the current lack of participation in the group has resulted from the success of the program. That Ernie is acquainted with an FBI COINTELPRO expert (mentioned in a [prj] list post on 12/11/08) did not miss my oversight. Bill and Milton made their unsupportive reason for participation rather clear.

Why not post a copy of this post by Ernie from 12-11-08?

I think the "message board" format will be less off-putting to people interested in topics that interest me. The e-mail list format is too easily over-run by interlopers and/or disruptors.

Note that Ernie actually likes to argue. . . it is his opponents that refuse to engage him. On the other hand, Ernie has become obsessed with my style of rhetoric as opposed to my substance.

Bill and Milton were often just insulting and off-putting.

Lloyd Miller, Research Director
A-albionic Research
A-albionic Research Inventory Liquidation Sale

Reply Quote

Ole Dude

#4

[-]

Posts: 205

Jan 25 09 12:41 PM

Sorry for the delay. I wrote a response to this earlier that apparently did not get posted. At any rate, here is the excerpt from Ernie's post to the list of 12/11/2008 4:00 PM:

Bill: I posted the following message last June --- and since it pertains to our current discussion, I copy it again: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/a-albionic/message/22295

------------------------

I discussed this general topic with the historian who visited me last year and again this month.

He specializes in the FBI's COINTELPRO-White Hate Group program and we were talking about the extraordinary number of neo-nazis and/or white hate group leaders who have been (1) dishonorably discharged from the military (2) convicted of serious crimes and/or (3) had some sort of sex-related issues revealed (child porn, sexual activity with minors, spousal abuse, homosexuality, etc.)

Reply Quote

ernie1241

Is Lloyd Intellectually Honest?

#5

[-]

Posts: 35

Jan 25 09 1:01 PM

Lloyd---I couldn't care less about your "style" of rhetoric - unless it becomes personally abusive.

I ALWAYS respond to the SUBSTANCE of what you write. How could you possibly mis-represent my replies after so many years of me quoting extensively from what you write and then responding to your specific IDEAS???

I used to think that despite our disagreements, you were intellectually honest. Perhaps I have been mistaken?

Incidentally, your reference to my acquaintance with "an FBI COINTELPRO expert" --- seems to have some sort of sinister undertone. A more accurate description is that he is a Professor who wrote his doctoral dissertation on the FBI's COINTELPRO program and has decided to specialize in that subject matter with respect to the FBI's COINTELPRO operations against "white hate groups" -- and the Black Panthers. A considerable amount of data that he has discovered from his years of research has "filled in the blanks" for all scholars interested in this subject matter.

You may see details regarding his education and his research plus a link to his website here:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/drabbs

LloydMiller wrote:

Ole Dude wrote:

I would suggest the liklihood that the nonsense I was met with when I began participating on this list was associated with "volunteers" recruited
to neutralize lists deemed "problematic." It seems likely that the current lack of participation in the group has resulted from the success of the
program. That Ernie is acquainted with an FBI COINTELPRO expert (mentioned in a [prj] list post on 12/11/08) did not miss my oversight. Bill and Milton made
their unsupportive reason for participation rather clear.

Why not post a copy of this post by Ernie from 12-11-08?

I think the "message board" format will be less off-putting to people interested in topics that interest me. The e-mail list format is too easily
over-run by interlopers and/or disruptors.

Note that Ernie actually likes to argue. . . it is his opponents that refuse to engage him. On the other hand, Ernie has become obsessed with my style of
rhetoric as opposed to my substance.

Bill and Milton were often just insulting and off-putting.

Reply Quote

Advertisement
	Remove this ad

Ole Dude

#6

[-]

Posts: 205

Jan 26 09 12:49 PM

I can confirm that John Drabble is prominently included in the COINTELPRO literature available on the internet, some of which has been censored from easy access. That this group has been recognized by its owner as a target of political entities that find it "problematic" raises the ante as to whether a close relationship by one of it's members with a COINTELPRO expert might be more than coincidental.

From wikipedia:

Reports that COINTELPRO tactics continue

While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, suspicions persist that the program's tactics continued informally.^[35]^[36] Critics have suggested that subsequent FBI actions indicate that post-COINTELPRO reforms in the agency did not succeed in ending the program's tactics.^[37] The Associated Press reported in November 2008 that documents released under the FOIA reportedly show that the FBI tracked the late Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author David Halberstam for more than two decades.^[38] A review by The Washington Post shows that Maryland activists were wrongly labeled as terrorists in state and federal databases by state police's Homeland Security and Intelligence Division from 2005 to at least early 2007. ^[39]

"Counterterrorism" guidelines implemented during the Reagan administration have been described as undercutting these reforms, allowing a return to earlier tactics.^[40] Some radical groups accuse factional opponents of being FBI informants or assume the FBI is infiltrating the movement.^[41]

Several authors have accused the FBI of continuing to deploy COINTELPRO-like tactics against radical groups after the official COINTELPRO operations were ended. Several authors have suggested the American Indian Movement (AIM) has been a target of such operations.

A few authors go further and allege that the federal government intended to acquire uranium deposits on the Lakota tribe's reservation land, and that this motivated a larger government conspiracy against AIM activists on the Pine Ridge reservation.^[42]^[14]^[2]^[43]^[44] Others believe COINTELPRO continues and similar actions are being taken against activist groups.^[45]^[46]^[44]

Caroline Woidat argued that with respect to Native Americans, COINTELPRO should be understood within a historical context in which "Native Americans have been viewed and have viewed the world themselves through the lens of conspiracy theory."^[47]

Other authors note that while there are conspiracy theories related to COINTELPRO, the issue of ongoing government surveillance and repression is nonetheless real.^[48]

Reply Quote

LloydMiller

#7

[-]

Posts: 603

Jan 26 09 4:50 PM

ernie1241 wrote:
Lloyd---I couldn't care less about your "style" of rhetoric - unless it becomes personally abusive.

[Reply] Uh, I was talking about your obsession with my use of the word treason which I would classify as obsession with my "style of rhetoric." Please note the context of my statement, however. I was defending you against the suspicions of "oledude." [Lloyd said]

Incidentally, your reference to my acquaintance with "an FBI COINTELPRO expert" --- seems to have some sort of sinister undertone.

[Reply] Ole Dude said that no me. [Lloyd said]

Lloyd Miller, Research Director
A-albionic Research
A-albionic Research Inventory Liquidation Sale

Reply Quote

ernie1241

#8

[-]

Posts: 35

Jan 27 09 1:57 PM

I have no "obsession" about your use of the word Lloyd --- but YOU have a definite obsession with characterizing every conceivable imperfect being (from your perspective) as guilty of treason. As previously stated, it is the SCOPE of people you include within the parameters of your use of that description that is most significant as well as your disingenuous attempts at claiming you don't use the term in any legalistic sense---but then simultaneously posting messages about "forcing" people to change their minds or putting them "on trial" for treason.

If you don't want to be held accountable for your use of language -- then be more careful how you describe people and ideas and positions.

Yes, I recognize that my Drabble comment was misdirected. Sorry about that. Sometimes this format confuses me about who is writing and who is responding ... or perhaps I am just growing senile---lol.

LloydMiller wrote:

ernie1241 wrote:

Lloyd---I couldn't care less about your "style" of rhetoric - unless it becomes personally abusive.

[Reply] Uh, I was talking about
your obsession with my use of the word treason which I would classify as obsession with my "style of rhetoric." Please note the context of my
statement, however. I was defending you against the suspicions of "oledude." [Lloyd said]

Incidentally, your reference to my acquaintance with "an FBI COINTELPRO expert" --- seems to have some sort of sinister undertone.

[Reply] Ole Dude said that no me. [Lloyd said]

Reply Quote

LloydMiller

#9

[-]

Posts: 603

Feb 1 09 3:09 AM

ernie1241 wrote:
but then simultaneously posting messages about "forcing" people to change their minds or putting them "on trial" for treason.

If you would look back at that quote you would see I was talking about "the people" or "public opinion" forcing public figures/politicians, etc. to conform--force there being metaphorical for "public pressure". . . but, of course, when people violate secrecy laws, particularly when that violation is a clear aid and comfort to an enemy, that rises to the level of legal treason and should be prosecuted either as such or at least as a violation of secrecy laws.

Lloyd Miller, Research Director
A-albionic Research
A-albionic Research Inventory Liquidation Sale

Reply Quote

Yuku free message boards

Israel hires bloggers to patrol anti-war blog sites. cunni123@yahoo.com

Israel hires bloggers to patrol anti-war blog sites. cunni123@yahoo.com

Israel Recruits Army Of Bloggers To Troll Anti-War Websites

Reports that COINTELPRO tactics continue